Member-only story

How the First State Has Favored the Rich, Powerful, and Criminal - and at What Cost?

Alex Reed

·12.6k Followers· Follow

Published in What S The Matter With Delaware?: How The First State Has Favored The Rich Powerful And Criminal And How It Costs Us All

4 min read · 2 weeks before

227 View Claps

31 Respond

Save

Listen

The First State has a long history of favoring the rich, powerful, and criminal. This has come at a great cost to the state, both financially and in terms of its reputation. In this article, we will explore the history of this favoritism and its consequences.

What’s the Matter with Delaware?: How the First State Has Favored the Rich, Powerful, and Criminal—and How It Costs Us All

by Hal Weitzman

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	3997 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	283 pages

A History of Favoritism

The First State was founded in the 17th century by a group of wealthy landowners. These landowners established a system of laws and government that favored their own interests. For example, they created a tax system that exempted the wealthy from paying taxes. They also established a legal system that made it difficult for the poor to seek justice.

This system of favoritism continued for centuries. In the 19th century, the First State became a center for the slave trade. The state's government officials turned a blind eye to the slave trade, and even profited from it. This made the First State a haven for slave traders and other criminals.

In the 20th century, the First State continued to favor the rich and powerful. The state's government officials allowed corporations to pollute the environment without penalty. They also passed laws that made it difficult for unions to organize workers. This made the First State a haven for the rich and powerful, but it also made it a difficult place to live for the poor and working class.

The Consequences of Favoritism

The First State's history of favoritism has had a number of negative consequences. For one, it has led to a high level of income inequality. The rich in the First State are some of the richest people in the world, while the poor are some of the poorest. This inequality has led to a number of social problems, such as crime, poverty, and homelessness.

Secondly, the First State's favoritism has damaged its reputation. The state is now known as a haven for the rich and powerful, and a place where criminals can go to escape justice. This has made it difficult for the First State to attract businesses and tourists.

Finally, the First State's favoritism has cost the state a great deal of money. The state has had to spend millions of dollars to clean up pollution caused by corporations. It has also had to spend millions of dollars to provide social services to the poor and working class. This has put a strain on the state's budget and has made it difficult to fund other important programs.

The First State's history of favoritism has had a number of negative consequences. It has led to high income inequality, damaged the state's reputation, and cost the state a great deal of money. It is time for the First State to change its ways and start to favor all of its citizens, not just the rich, powerful, and criminal.

What’s the Matter with Delaware?: How the First State Has Favored the Rich, Powerful, and Criminal—and How It Costs Us All

by Hal Weitzman

5 out of 5