Member-only story

Of Rule and Revenue: California's Experiment in Social Choice and Political Economy

Floyd Richardson

·5.9k Followers· Follow

Published in Of Rule And Revenue (California On Social Choice And Political Economy 13)

6 min read · 2 weeks before

77 View Claps

9 Respond

Save

Listen

California, the most populous state in the United States, has long been a crucible of social and political experimentation. In recent years, the state has been at the forefront of efforts to use social choice theory to design institutions that promote economic efficiency and social equity. Social choice theory is a branch of economics that studies how individuals make collective decisions. It has been used to design a wide range of institutions, from voting systems to market mechanisms.

In California, social choice theory has been used to design a number of innovative policies, including the state's cap-and-trade program, its minimum wage law, and its campaign finance system. These policies have been controversial, but they have also been successful in achieving their goals. The cap-and-trade program has helped to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the minimum wage law has increased the incomes of low-wage workers, and the campaign finance system has reduced the influence of money in politics.

California's experiment in social choice and political economy is ongoing. It is too early to say whether the state's policies will be successful in the long run. However, the state's willingness to experiment with new ideas is a testament to its commitment to finding innovative solutions to the challenges of the 21st century.

Of Rule and Revenue (California on Social Choice and Political Economy 13)

Of Rule and Revenue (California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy Book 13)

by Margaret Levi

4.6 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2937 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	264 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

Social choice theory is a branch of economics that studies how individuals make collective decisions. It is based on the assumption that individuals have different preferences and that there is no way to determine which preferences are "correct." Social choice theory provides a framework for designing institutions that allow individuals to make collective decisions in a fair and efficient way.

One of the most important concepts in social choice theory is the Pareto criterion. A Pareto improvement is a change in the status quo that makes at least one individual better off without making anyone worse off. A Pareto-optimal outcome is an outcome that cannot be improved upon by any Pareto improvement.

The Pareto criterion is a useful starting point for designing social choice institutions. However, it is not always possible to find a Pareto-optimal outcome. In some cases, there may be multiple Pareto-optimal outcomes, and it may be necessary to choose between them using other criteria.

In addition to the Pareto criterion, there are a number of other criteria that can be used to evaluate social choice institutions. These criteria include:

Efficiency: An efficient institution is one that maximizes the total welfare of the individuals in the society.
Fairness: A fair institution is one that distributes the benefits and burdens of collective decisions in a just way.
Stability: A stable institution is one that is resistant to change.
Transparency: A transparent institution is one that is open and accountable to the public.

There is no single "correct" set of criteria for evaluating social choice institutions. The best institution for a particular society will depend on the specific circumstances of that society.

California has been at the forefront of efforts to use social choice theory to design institutions that promote economic efficiency and social equity. In recent years, the state has implemented a number of innovative policies, including:

The cap-and-trade program: The cap-and-trade program is a market-based system for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The program sets a cap on the total amount of emissions that can be produced in the state, and it allows businesses to trade permits to emit greenhouse gases. The program has been successful in reducing emissions, and it has also generated revenue that has been used to fund clean energy projects.
The minimum wage law: The minimum wage law sets a minimum wage that employers must pay their employees. The law has been successful in increasing the incomes of low-wage workers, and it has also helped to reduce poverty.
The campaign finance system: The campaign finance system restricts the amount of money that individuals and organizations can contribute to political campaigns. The system has been successful in reducing the influence of money in politics, and it has also made it easier for candidates to run for office without having to rely on large donors.

These policies have been controversial, but they have also been successful in achieving their goals. The cap-and-trade program has helped to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the minimum wage law has increased the incomes of low-wage workers, and the campaign finance system has reduced the influence of money in politics.

California's experiment in social choice and political economy is a bold and ambitious effort to use social science to design institutions that promote economic efficiency and social equity. The state's policies have been controversial, but they have also been successful in achieving their goals. California's experiment is still ongoing, and it is too early to say whether it will be successful in the long run. However, the state's willingness to experiment with new ideas is a testament to its commitment to finding innovative solutions to the challenges of the 21st century.

Of Rule and Revenue (California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy Book 13)

by Margaret Levi

4.6 out of 5